At 7.30 on a wet Tuesday you can walk from K-Road to Mt Eden in under fifteen minutes. By the end of next year, that same walk links you to a citywide rail spine, frequent buses, and jobs in every direction. That is the future Auckland Council is finally planning for: more homes where the network already works, fewer homes where water keeps sending warning letters.
Council is moving away from the old blanket three-storey settings and toward a map: lift heights and density around rapid transit and frequent buses, pull back from flood and coastal hazards, and keep overall capacity roughly stable but move it to places the city can service. For investors, that’s not theory. It’s a set of buy/hold/exit decisions with real money attached.
“Policy changes don’t move markets as much as stories and this plan change gets that,” says APIA GM, Sarina Gibbon. “The city’s story is being rewritten with proximity being the default aspiration and flood risk being the immediate discount. It’s salience over spreadsheets and capital where people can live a car-lite, stay dry and, in a way, defy gravity.”
From blanket to map
Blanket rules created options on paper, including in places that were never going to be easy to service or insure. The map approach concentrates permission where transport and pipes already exist. That doesn’t shrink opportunity; it focuses it. If you own or can buy within an 800–1200 m walk of a CRL station or in the ~200 m depth off a named frequent bus corridor, your next project just became more credible. If your site sits in a newly mapped hazard area, expect stricter activity statuses and a tougher audience from insurers and lenders. Price that in now.
Capacity isn’t feasibility
Models can show six storeys all they want and they would still be useless if banks refuse to fund. Parcel shape, vehicle access, daylight, servicing constraints and neighbour interfaces decide what gets built. Think of the new heights as a cap, not a guarantee. The discipline is the same: conservative assumptions, real lead times, and a margin for infrastructure upgrades. If the numbers clear under those conditions, you’ve got something worth holding.
Consents should match the map
If the plan says “grow here,” the pathway should say “this way.” APIA will push for fast consenting lanes in 6–15-storey priority areas: streamlined processes, short and certain timeframes, fewer subjective hurdles that add cost without adding quality, and transparent public reporting of processing times. We’ll publish a quarterly dashboard so members can see exactly where the system is sticking and who needs a nudge.
Use the fast-lane filter
A simple screen you can run on your own sites:
- Proximity: within an 800–1200 m walk of CRL stations and metro centres; within ~200 m of named frequent bus corridors.
- Hazards: clear of current flood and coastal hazard layers, or with a defensible mitigation path and insurability.
- Form: mid-rise or terraced typologies plausible given site shape, access and neighbours.
Sites that pass all three deserve immediate feasibility work. Sites that fail the walk test or hazard test aren’t dead, but your timeline lengthens and costs get stickier.
Paper first, romance later
Before you go unconditional, get a formal pre-application meeting record that acknowledges intended height and form in principle. It won’t guarantee consent. It will flush overlays, servicing limits and design triggers early enough to renegotiate or exit. Lenders respect paperwork; treat it as a risk-pricing tool, not a ritual.
Field notes for investors: Hazard red flags to price now
- Newly mapped flood extents or coastal inundation overlays
- Insurance excess jumps or conditional cover terms
- Servicing constraints flagged at pre-app
- Minimum floor levels and overland flow path conflicts
What to do now
- Run the fast-lane filter over your portfolio and shortlist. Anything that clears proximity and hazards goes to feasibility. Everything else is “monitor or trade.”
- Anchor with a pre-app before going unconditional. If the record throws you a curveball, you still have bargaining power.
- Build a conservative stack: six-storey base case, higher consenting costs in year one, real lead times, allowance for upgrades. If it still sings, you’re in the right spot.
Join APIA: Back the advocacy that keeps investor interests front and centre, and get the tools that turn this planning reset into financeable projects. Your membership strengthens our voice in a dynamic environment and gives you a practical edge where it counts.
Add Comment